Malayalam Actress attack Case

[jeeva]

Lokathu nadakunna peedana casukalil 70% fake anenna kadethal njan paranjathalla oru law journal paranjathanu ....aghane oru avastha undenkill areyum munkutti arum vidikalle wait for final verdict...

[anupkerb1]

Lokathu nadakunna peedana casukalil 70% fake anenna kadethal njan paranjathalla oru law journal paranjathanu ....aghane oru avastha undenkill areyum munkutti arum vidikalle wait for final verdict...

Casting counch peril etra peedana case vannu , enthinu athikam Franco case edayi .. aa tym elarum kodathiye theri paraju paisa vaangi enoke paranju . enitipol enthu sambhavichu . appeal pokum enoke aanu elarum parajirunu . pine onum undayila .. aareyum vizhutan pattuna onnanu peedana case . athipol fake aayalum kurachu nal (vidhi varuna vare avare maximum nanam kedutham ) . prove cheyan sadhichilenkil case koduthavarkum yathoru problem ilaa .. kodathi paisa koduthu prathikal vaangi ennu paranju avar talayoorum . athiloru mattavum ipozhum illa .. saritha savitha sangeetha ellam oormayilee .

[sankar1992]

അവർ ഇപ്പോൾ ശ്രമിക്കുന്നത് , അവർ കോടതിയിൽ ഹാജരാക്കിയ ആ മെമ്മറി കാർഡ് ഉള്ള വീഡിയോ എഡിറ്റഡ് ആണെന്ന് തെളിയിക്കാൻ ആണ് . ആ മെമ്മറി കാർഡ് ഉള്ള ദൃശ്യത്തിലെ സംഭാഷണങ്ങൾ നടി കേസ് തന്നെ തല കീഴാക്കി മറക്കും എന്ന് അവർക്കു അറിയാം. അത് കൊണ്ട് അത് എഡിറ്റഡ് ആണെന് എങ്ങനെയെങ്കിലും തെളിയിച്ചാൽ പിന്നെ ആ സംഭാഷണം ഉള്ള ദൃശ്യം പ്രതിഭാഗത്തിനു ഉപേയാഗിക്കാൻ സാധിക്കില്ലല്ലോ എന്ന് ചാണക്യ തന്ത്രം ആണ് . പക്ഷെ അതൊന്നും നടക്കാൻ പോകുന്നില്ല . കുറച്ചു പേരെ എങ്കിലും തലകാലത്തേക്കു പറ്റിക്കാം . വിധി എതിരായാൽ ജഡ്*ജി , കോടതി പൈസ വാങ്ങി എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞു വീണ്ടും പറ്റിക്കാം . വിധി വരുമ്പോൾ എല്ലാം അതിൽ ഉണ്ടാക്കും . ദിലീപിനെ പോട്ടെ . ആ കൃത്യത്തിൽ പങ്കെടുത്ത പൾസർ എങ്കിലും പീഡന കേസിൽ ശിക്ഷിക്കാൻ സാധിലെങ്കിൽ പണി പാളും . ഫോട്ടോ എടുക്കാൻ ശ്രമിച്ചതിന് അല്ല . ഇവർ പറഞ്ഞ പോലെ ഡൽഹി മോഡൽ സമാനമായ പീഡന കേസിൽ കനത്ത ശിക്ഷ തന്നെ വാങ്ങി കൊടുക്കണം .
adv മിനിയിൽ എനിക്ക് നല്ല വിശ്വാസം ഉണ്ട് . എല്ലാർക്കും തൂക്കു ശിക്ഷ തന്നെ കിട്ടും . കുറ്റം തെളിഞ്ഞാൽ

athe...memory card le visual tampered aanennu kaanikkanam...lucky that dileep has forensic report of the visuals ... that is from 2018 itself... vicharana thudangum munne thanne visual il enthanu ullath ennu report ullathukond...ivarude oru nadakavum ini nadakkan pokunnilla... brain kondpoyi paavadayude ullil thirukiya "smallboys" mathram vishwasikkum...

[Salt n pepper]

It’s actually pathetic that some people on here feel like they need to be “thankful” to an actor for doing a job that they were doing. Again, basically was a producer and actor - he was making the same type of comedy films which worked throughout the 2000s. He was profiting off of this business of supply and demand.

People already gave him their “thanks” for his successful films by actually paying for the ticket and making those films a hit. No one owes him anything more now. His films haven’t merited any appreciation in recent times. They are all tailor made to try to white wash his public persona as well. Malayalees aren’t stupid they see through this crap.. also his recent crap films also.

Again, in this case it wasn’t the victim; the actress who came up with hash value change. This came from the court. This was publicized weeks ago and then only did the victim react.

Just because this actor “Dileep” has a film coming out in few weeks doesn’t mean anything. His previous film Thankamani came out not that long ago and flopped disastrously.

There was 0 news against him when that crap film came out. Nothing was raised up to tarnish his image or right at the time of the release of his film.

The film bombed badly because this is an actor, producer and a guy who has not kept himself updated. He’s way too old. And his upcoming film has him as a 56+ year old man trying to woo young girls in a romance genre film. That film also has Radhika Sarathkumar who is actually near his age playing his mother. Brother… what era are we living in?! Who is able to believe this nonsense.

Tell me why should anyone give this guy any more attention or respect than he currently deserves. He’s still doing outdated crap from decades ago.

Again, this is not even factoring all the shady stuff he’s done. Also, the intense amount of PR work he did to harass the victim on social media. If this was in the US or somewhere in the West, I’d imagine this case would’ve reached a conclusion. This guy may have power and money to influence court - like it has come out with the shady Judge Honey Varghese hash value incident.

Also, please be intelligent. Just because he’s an actor doesn’t mean he should deserve more respect than any of the other accused members in this case. How come no one is vouching for their innocence. Blind support for a guy who had a curated image ; again all of which was tarnished by himself anyways.

It’s not like the inside industry talks speak about him as a great guy or anything either. Infact, I also see the rise in quality of films since he took the backseat since 2010 onwards if anything.

""" Ningal enthu thenga anu parayunnathu " Ippozhathe heros ozhike ethu nadanamarudem nayika mar nokkiyal nalla praya vathyam ullavaranu, dileep mathram enthanu ningalkku prasanam??
Pinne amma role, athippo mammootty mohanal rajani onnum ningal kanunnille? Dileep mathre ullo prsanam. 2000 tmil mohanalalinte enthu film und nallathu,
Mohanalal okke select cheyyunna movies ningal nokku, nalla padam kittathottandallo, angerde selction angane anu....Dileep nalla business man koode anu, anger midukkan ayathu kondanu 2000s nalla filims kodukkan kazhinjathu, a smayathu across south nalla filmsukal illarunnu, kurachu Vikram films Ozhike.

Pinne Bhavana , ningal avarude films nokku she survived only becoz of Dileep , avar ekadesham out ayathanu ..pinne kannada producer , e issue athokond mathram kurachu padangal kittunnu.....

[Salt n pepper]

Oru nalla film vannal marunna prsaname ullu Dileepinum ,mohanlalinum, mamoottykum okke...

[anupkerb1]

നടിയെ ആക്രമിച്ച കേസ് വാദം പൂർത്തിയായി . പ്രതികൾക്ക് പറയ്യാൻ ഉള്ളത് കേൾക്കാൻ സെപ്തംബര് 26 മുതൽ . വിധി അതിനു ശേഷം .

109 ദിവസം വിസ്തരിച്ചു ബൈജു

[Arya]

നടിയെ ആക്രമിച്ച കേസ്; പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം

കൊച്ചിയിൽ നടിയെ അക്രമിച്ച കേസിൽ പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം. സുപ്രീം കോടതിയാണ് ജാമ്യം അനുവദിച്ചത്. ഏഴര വർഷത്തിന് ശേഷമാണ് പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം ലഭിക്കുന്നത്. കൊച്ചിയിൽ നടിയെ ആക്രമിച്ച സംഭവത്തിൽ 2017- ഫെബ്രുവരി 23 മുതൽ പൾസർ സുനി ജയിലിലാണ്.

[BangaloreaN]

നടിയെ ആക്രമിച്ച കേസ്; പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം

കൊച്ചിയിൽ നടിയെ അക്രമിച്ച കേസിൽ പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം. സുപ്രീം കോടതിയാണ് ജാമ്യം അനുവദിച്ചത്. ഏഴര വർഷത്തിന് ശേഷമാണ് പൾസർ സുനിക്ക് ജാമ്യം ലഭിക്കുന്നത്. കൊച്ചിയിൽ നടിയെ ആക്രമിച്ച സംഭവത്തിൽ 2017- ഫെബ്രുവരി 23 മുതൽ പൾസർ സുനി ജയിലിലാണ്.

സ്വീകരണം ഉണ്ടാകുമോ ? 🤔

[Arya]

'Trial Not Likely To Conclude Soon In Actress Sexual Assault Case', Says Supreme Court Granting Bail To Main Accused Pulsar Suni

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (September 17) granted bail to Sunil NS, also known as Pulsar Suni, the main accused in the 2017 actress sexual assault case, after considering his long period of incarceration and the slow progress of the trial. Suni, who has been in custody for more than seven and a half years, is accused of conspiring with Malayalam actor Dileep and others in the abduction and sexual assault of the actress in a moving vehicle near Kochi in February 2017.

A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih noted that as 268 prosecution witnesses have been examined and there are nine accused in the case, completing the trial, including the recording of statements of the accused under Section 313 of the CrPC, would take considerable time.

“The appellant has undergone incarceration for more than seven and a half years. All other co-accused have been granted bail…We have also noted the manner in which trial has progressed. Accused no. 8 cross examined the investigating officer from 15th February 2024 to 10th September 2024. The deposition of the said witnesses runs to 1800 pages. Since 261 witnesses have been examined and the case involves nine accused even recording of statements under section 313 of the CrPC will take a long time. Considering the long incarceration and the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude within a reasonable time, a case is made out for enlarging the appellant on bail”, the Court stated in the order.

The Court also took into account that all other co-accused had already been granted bail. The Court observed that the investigating officer had been under cross-examination by Dileep's counsel from February 15, 2024, to September 10, 2024, and the deposition had reached 1,800 pages. Considering these factors, the Supreme Court held that the long delay in the trial and Suni's extended incarceration justified granting him bail.

The Court directed that Suni should be produced before the trial court within a week for the finalization of bail conditions, with the State being heard before the terms are finalized.


While the Supreme Court opined that that costs should not have been imposed on Suni by the Kerala High Court when it dismissed his 10th bail application, it decided not to interfere with the Rs. 25,000 fine since the amount would be directed to the Kerala Legal Services Authority.

The Court last month sought details from the State of Kerala regarding the number of remaining witnesses to be examined in the 2017 actress sexual assault case while hearing the bail application of Sunil NS, also known as Pulsar Suni, the main accused in the case. During the proceedings on that day, Advocate Sriram Parakkat, representing Pulsar Suni, informed the bench that Prosecution Witness (PW-261) has been under examination by actor Dileep's counsel for the past 95 days. Dileep, a prominent Malayalam actor, is a co-accused in the case, charged with conspiracy behind the abduction and sexual assault of the actress, which took place in a moving vehicle on the outskirts of Kochi in February 2017. The charges against Suni and his co-accused include Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 109 (abetment), 342 (wrongful confinement), 366 (kidnapping), 354 (assault on a woman), 354B (use of criminal force with intent to disrobe), 357 (assault or criminal force), 376D (gang rape), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), and 212 (harboring an offender) of the IPC and Sections 66A and 66E of the Information Technology Act. There are a total of 10 accused in the case. The Supreme Court has been monitoring the trial's progress, receiving status reports from the trial judge periodically. On May 8, 2023, the Court had set a deadline for the trial to be completed by July 31, 2023, based on a report from the trial judge. However, in August 2023, the Supreme Court extended this deadline to March 31, 2024. The Kerala High Court earlier this year dismissed the 10th bail application filed by Pulsar Suni. Justice PV Kunhikrishnan of the HC also imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on Suni for filing repeated bail applications, stating that his 10th application was filed within three days of the previous one being rejected. The court noted that Suni had been filing bail applications without any change in circumstances. The HC noted that it had considered all the contentions of Suni and dismissed his bail applications. It found that the Apex Court has also dismissed his bail applications twice, once in 2022 and in 2023. The HC remarked on the financial resources Suni seemingly had at his disposal to repeatedly engage different lawyers before both the HC and the Supreme Court, despite being in custody for over seven years. The HC also pointed out that Suni's case involves allegations of conspiracy in the abduction and assault, with Dileep allegedly being the mastermind behind the crime. The HC observed that Suni had filed multiple bail applications, all of which were dismissed. The HC highlighted that Suni's recent bail applications had no substantive change in the facts or circumstances, calling the 10th application “frivolous.” The HC referred to Vineeth v. State of Kerala (2015), which held that courts have the authority to impose costs in cases where parties use delaying tactics or attempt to mislead the court. The HC held that costs can be imposed in appropriate cases, especially when it appears that a petitioner is attempting to delay proceedings or misuse the judicial process.

Case no. – SLP(Crl.) No. 11147/2024
Case Title – Sunil NS v. State of Kerala



https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/t...ar-suni-269763

[BangaloreaN]

'Trial Not Likely To Conclude Soon In Actress Sexual Assault Case', Says Supreme Court Granting Bail To Main Accused Pulsar Suni

“The appellant has undergone incarceration for more than seven and a half years. All other co-accused have been granted bail…We have also noted the manner in which trial has progressed. Accused no. 8 cross examined the investigating officer from 15th February 2024 to 10th September 2024. The deposition of the said witnesses runs to 1800 pages. Since 261 witnesses have been examined and the case involves nine accused even recording of statements under section 313 of the CrPC will take a long time. Considering the long incarceration and the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude within a reasonable time, a case is made out for enlarging the appellant on bail”, the Court stated in the order.

അന്തിമ വിധി വരുമ്പോഴേക്കും പ്രതികൾ വയസ്സായി മരിച്ചു പോകും എന്ന് സുപ്രീം കോടതിക്ക് തോന്നിക്കാണും .