Page 1139 of 1139 FirstFirst ... 139639103910891129113711381139
Results 11,381 to 11,388 of 11388

Thread: Malayalam Actress attack Case

  1. #11381
    FK Lover sankar1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    kochi
    Posts
    2,875

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post
    സ്വീകരണം ഉണ്ടാകുമോ ?
    Vaadhi bhagath ninnu undakan chance und...
    "നമുക്കൊരു ഒന്നൊ​ന്നര പടമുണ്ടെന്നു പറ" !!

  2. Sponsored Links ::::::::::::::::::::Remove adverts
  3. #11382

  4. #11383

    Default



    Aalu mudukkan ayallo Aarogya prasnamokke undennu paranjitt


  5. #11384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BangaloreaN View Post
    സ്വീകരണം ഉണ്ടാകുമോ ?
    Mens association matto jai vilichu paper keeri parathiyittund

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/...03298736641591
    Last edited by Arya; 09-20-2024 at 05:08 PM.


  6. #11385
    FK Citizen anupkerb1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    ForumKERALAM
    Posts
    20,672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arya View Post


    Aalu mudukkan ayallo Aarogya prasnamokke undennu paranjitt
    health issue chicken pox anenuu aanu parajathu ... yo yo style chullan aaki mattiyatund . jail ellam avasthaa
    കഴിഞ്ഞ 60 വർഷത്തെ മലയാളം ചിത്രങ്ങളുടെ കളക്ഷൻ = 2024 ലെ ആദ്യ പകുതി

  7. Likes Arya liked this post
  8. #11386

    Default

    Actress Assault Case : Kerala High Court Dismisses Survivor's Application To Quash Fact-Finding Inquiry On Memory Card

    The Kerala High Court dismissed the application filed by the survivor in the 2017 actress sexual assault, involving Malayalam actor Dileep. The survivor filed the application to set aside or quash the fact-finding inquiry report dated January 08, 2024, submitted by the Ernakulam Sessions and District Judge.

    The present application was filed in a writ petition moved by the survivor that was disposed of with direction to conduct a fact-finding inquiry into the allegations that the memory card containing videos of the sexual assault had been accessed, copied and transferred unauthorizedly while it was in the custody of the Court.

    Justice C S Dias dismissed the application moved by the survivor as not maintainable and held that the survivor could initiate appropriate proceedings as per law.
    "On consideration of the facts and the exposition of law, I am of the definite view that the relief sought in the present application is substantive in nature and arise from a fresh and independent cause of action and are not ancillary in nature and therefore, I hold that this application is not maintainable in law. consequently, the application is dismissed without precluding the right of the applicant to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with the law."


    The survivor alleged that the fact-finding inquiry was conducted in secrecy without even hearing her. She further alleged that copy of inquiry report was denied to her stating that it was confidential and it was only given to her pursuant to the orders of the Court. She stated that even the statement of persons examined during the inquiry was given to her on the orders of the Court.
    The survivor alleges that the denial of the inquiry report and witness statements show malafides on the part of the enquiry authority until the intervention of the Court. It was also argued that an expert study with scientific investigation is required under the supervision of the Court since even the inquiry report shows that the memory card was unauthorizedly accessed and that its hash value was changed.
    The respondent contended that the applications filed by the survivor were not maintainable since the writ petition was already disposed of. It was argued that the remedy was to file a fresh writ petition.
    Case Title: XXX v. State of Kerala
    Case Number: W.P. (Crl.) 445/ 2022
    Detailed Order is awaited.

    https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/ke...-report-272317


  9. #11387
    FK Citizen anupkerb1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    ForumKERALAM
    Posts
    20,672

    Default

    മെമ്മറി കാർഡ് അനേഷണം വേണം എന്ന് ആവശ്യപ്പെട്ടതും അതിജീവിത , അനേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ട് റദ്ദു ആക്കണം എന്ന് ആവശ്യപ്പെട്ടതും അതിജീവിത .
    വനിത ജഡ്*ജി വേണമെന്നു പറഞ്ഞതും അതിജീവിത, വനിത ജഡ്*ജിയെ മാറ്റണം എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞതും അതിജീവിത
    കഴിഞ്ഞ 60 വർഷത്തെ മലയാളം ചിത്രങ്ങളുടെ കളക്ഷൻ = 2024 ലെ ആദ്യ പകുതി

  10. #11388
    FK Lover sankar1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    kochi
    Posts
    2,875

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anupkerb1 View Post
    മെമ്മറി കാർഡ് അനേഷണം വേണം എന്ന് ആവശ്യപ്പെട്ടതും അതിജീവിത , അനേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ട് റദ്ദു ആക്കണം എന്ന് ആവശ്യപ്പെട്ടതും അതിജീവിത .
    വനിത ജഡ്*ജി വേണമെന്നു പറഞ്ഞതും അതിജീവിത, വനിത ജഡ്*ജിയെ മാറ്റണം എന്ന് പറഞ്ഞതും അതിജീവിത
    njan parayunnath mathram angeekarikkunna oru kodathi...athayirunnu slowlyjeevitha swapnam kanda kodathi...
    "നമുക്കൊരു ഒന്നൊ​ന്നര പടമുണ്ടെന്നു പറ" !!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •